Electricity Employees Federation of India

 

    Home | Voice of Electricity workers | Press Release | Resolutions | Feedback | About Us
VOICE OF ELECTRICITY WORKERS
Oct-Dec 2001
Vol 2 No.4    Index

THE POWER SECTOR REFORMS - A DECADES EXPERIENCE

E.Balanandan

1. The power sector reforms initiated during 90’s based on world Bank, If prescriptions with the stated objective of achieving economies in power supply and faster development by privatizing and introducing competition failed miserably inspire of the plethora of steps taken by the government to attract independent power producers Indian and foreign. The increase in return on equity to 16% from 11% and the rate of depreciation raising to 8.24% from 3.5%, besides tax holidays guarantees and counter guarantees, Escrow, accounts beside the change in electricity laws in order to provide Electricity Regulatory Commission etc did not have the desired effects.
2. Many companies came forward to take up big projects in different parts of the country and signed MOUs with the government including many fast track ones after the announcement of the said concession. However, facts goes to show that many of them failed to complete the formalities and disappeared from the scene. Those of which were completed the cost per unit of power were prohibitably high. The Enron of Maharashtra was one among them needs no elaboration. The failure of private sector to complete the projects as promised resulted in drastic slippage in the eighth five-year plan. The target was 30,538 MW and the achievement only 16,422.5 MW. The slippage 46.3%. In the ninth plan too the story is not different. Out of the target of 40,245 MW as per the revised estimate the achievement will be about 21,000 MW and the slippage 48%.
3. The Prime Minister himself has gone on record while inaugurating the Chief Ministers’ conference on 3rd March 2001 that “the performance of the private sector during the last decade was dismal, they could produce only 5000 MW” and “in the initial phase of reforms in the power sector, we have adopted an approach of guaranteed return to the private producers. This made the tariff unacceptably high”. He has admitted two things that relying on the private sector for power development did not succeed and secondly in many case the private power producers cost was unaffordable. However he failed to consider the serious economic impact of nearly 50% slippage (14116+ 19245 MW) in power production did not bother to take corrective measures by increasing public funding for power development instead he was hell bent on proceeding with the world bank dictated power sector privatization.
4. It was insisted that the Orissa model is an exemplary one for power sector reforms and that everybody should copy this model. The Orissa Government trifurcated the State Electricity Boards into three segments generation, transmission and distribution in 1996 and subsequently the distribution segment was separated into four zones of which one was awarded to Cesco the US Power giant AES and the remaining three zones of BSES.
5. The model has been copied by Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Rajasthan and they have started taking measurers to separate generation, transmission and distributions. The privatization process is also being pushed through.
6. During the span of the last five years the Orissa State Electricity regulatory commission hiked power rates five times, which resulted in three fold rise in the power rates. In spite of some improvement in T&D losses and revenue collections the distribution companies CESCO, AES and others failed to pay more than Rs.1,500 crores to Grid Co the Government own transmission company for the cost of power though these companies collected money from the consumers at increased rates. In turn the transmission company failed to pay the OPGC the private generating company in which AES the American power giant, is a major stakeholder about Rs.400 crores for the cost of power they have taken.
7. Consequently the Orissa Power generating company (AES) threatened denial of power supply to the Grid Co and thus created a situation that of a complete power blackout in the state of Orissa. To counter this the government of Orissa decided to use ESMA against OPGC. Thus a very serious power crisis engulfed the state.
8. Simultaneously a reign of terror has been let loose against employees and engineers flouting all the legal provisions and agreed norms including trade union rights. The distribution companies failed to deposit the PF deductions amounting to crores of rupees. LIC premium withheld, pension funds misused, denial of LTC, leave surrender, increments; the promotions policy given up. 50% increase in work pressure reducing the complement of the workforce, besides victimization, suspensions and dismissal. Above all, denial of salaries in time.
9. This forced employees including engineers’ collectively started agitation against the company, which forced Government of Orissa to approach the Electricity Regulatory Commission’s intervention. The Commission ordered removal AES from the management of CESCO and an IAS officer to take charge of the company. Ordered the payment of dues to workers and engineers. Thus the big American Power Company AES is forced out of the management of CESCO.
10. Without further elaboration let me quote the official high power committee headed by Mr.Mantek Singh Ahluvaliya……“After five years of experience of power sector reforms in Orissa, losses of the privatized distribution companies in the State have crossed Rs. Thousand crores and net worth of these companies is negative and their ability to borrow in the market for capital investment has been eroded however, they continued to have access to the state government loans provided by the world bank. Further the state owned transmission company, Gridco, which is also the monopoly buyer of power generated in the State, is unable to recover dues from the private distribution companies and is carrying accumulated losses/receivables exceeding Rs. 1,500 crores. System in Orissa seemed to be facing impending bankruptcy and the quality of supply has not improved materially and there has been little new investment.” This is the story of the sad demise of the Orissa model, narrated by its own architects and promoters. However the people of Orissa had to pay three fold for the power they consumed. No improvement in power supply. The 800 villages flooded before two years did not get the power system restored. Besides the total negative impact on the development of the state.
11. All those SEB’s copied Orissa model hiked power rates twice or thrice within this period invoked people resentment in a big way in different areas.
12. The greater Noida experience is also quite the same. The UP electricity board privatize the greater Noida power distribution system which was taken over by the Noida power company. The U.P electricity board charged them 1.40 paise per unit approximately 50% of the prevailing rate they charged 2 rupees to the consumers and collected dues accordingly. While the company failed to make payments to the electricity board and the outstanding today is more than 150 crores.
13. The experience of Enron (DPC) Maharashtra needs no elaboration since now the issues are very much in public knowledge. The Enron the US multi national giant got the power purchase agreement signed by the men at the top dealing with power in Maharashtra in connivance with those high ups in New Delhi spending more than 60 crores disclosed till now for ‘educating’ – rather greasing them. The objection raised by many including the trade unions were over ruled by the Government and the judiciary including the Supreme Court. However when the experience of rupees 8 plus per unit of current supplied by DPC literally had a rude shock for everyone of them. Maharashtra Electricity Board, Maharashtra Govt, and Govt at the Centre. MSEB finally forced to say that they are not able to consume Enron power since the rate is unaffordable and thus power generation DPC (Enron)come to an end.
14. Now the Enron company through the US government authorities are pressurising government of India to bear the burden of Enron with the threat that US will dissociate in industrial ventures in India. One cannot definitely says
Mr. Vajpayee government will submit to US pressures by forsaking our national interest.
15. The latest in the Electricity reforms is the attempt of the govt of India to implement the expert committee’s report headed by Shri. Montek Singh Ahluvaliya which is supposed to be intended for bailing out the electricity board from the deep debt liability which is estimated being 25000 crores principal and 15,000 crores interest charges. The suggestions made is that 50% of the accumulated interest plus the principal about 35,000 crores will be converted into tax free bonds after waving 50% of accumulated interest. The repayment of bonds will begin after five years in installments to be cleared within fifteen years, on condition that the states should undertake reforms in the power sector.
16. The increase in the liability of electricity boards was due to the increase in the power rates by the central utilities and private power operators. The cause for this hike was also attributable to the reform policies like the raising of depreciation rates and the increase in investment returns besides the escalation of the fuel costs. However the bail out program is based on the privatisation on the power sector. This again will lead to increase in power rates. It is interesting to note that the India’s power rates was almost lowest in the world during 1991 Rs1.09 and by 2000 it went up to Rs 3.04 which is above the world standard which means our competitive efficiency is dwindling .
17. Unmindful of this the govt of India is taking steps to make a comprehensive legal frame work to privitising the power sector for which the electricity bill 2001 is introduced in Lok Sabha on 29th August 2001. The crux of the objectives as stated in the bill is quoted below:
“ With the policy of encouraging private sector participation in generation transmission and distribution and the objective of distancing the regulatory responsibilities from the Government to the Regulatory Commission……..Accordingly it became necessary to enact a new legislation for regulating the electricity supply industry in the country which would replace the existing laws, preserve its core features other than those relating to the mandatory existence of the State Electricity Board and the responsibilities of the State Government and the State Electricity Board with respect to regulating licensees. There is also need to provide for newer concept like power trading and open access………”
The above shows that the govt. of India is out to privatize the whole power industry by transferring the enormous public wealth created in the Indian power sector is sought to be given to the private companies Indian and foreign for nominal costs. The privatization will only increase the power rates to unaffordable levels since the private capitalists are only interested to make maximum profit. If this vital infrastructure facility is taken over by the profit hunters the peoples interest of power at affordable rates will be the first causality and above all the nations competitive efficiency will seriously be weakened.
The international experience too shows beyond doubt that the private operators domination in the power sector is dangerous. Caliphornia (USA) which has come in to focus during January this year gives a graphic lesson. Without elaborating I shall give some excerpters from the speech made by The California Governer Grey Devis on 8th January 2000.
“……..But we must face reality California’s deregulation scheme is a colossal and dangerous failure . It has not lowered consumer prices it has not increased supply. In fact, it has resulted in skyrocketing prices, price gouging and an unreliable supply of electricity. In short, an energy nightmare.’’
“The out-of-state generators who bought most of our utility’s power plants are now charging California several hundred percent more for wholesale electricity than we paid just one year ago.”
“Worst of all, there’s evidence that some generators maybe withholding electricity from the California grid to create artificial scarcity, which in turn, drives up the price astronomically.
My friends, electricity is not an exotic commodity like pork bellies, to be traded in the chaotic equivalent of a future market; electricity is a basic necessity of life. It is the very fuel that powers our high tech economy”
18. After this the Govt of California has taken many measures to impose cap on whole sale our rates and taken steps to take over private power utilities and steps to govt control over the power industry. Now this is spreading to other states too. It has become a big debating point in the Unites States.
19. In short the policy of privatization being perused by the govt is absolutely wrong and hence those who are interested in the countries progress must unitedly oppose it.
 

Copyright © 2002 - 2004 Electricity Employees Federation of India. All Rights Reserved.
Email: 
info@eefi.org · Feedback · Terms and Conditions ·