JULY-SEPTEMBER, 2002VOL. 3
NO.3 Fortune magazine recently published its latest “Global 500” listing of the world’s 500 largest corporations, ranked by their sales (revenues) in 2001. Eleven enterprises are from China, which is the product of a socialist revolution despite capitalist inroads., and all eleven are state-owned, according to Fortune. For the remaining 489 corporations, the results testify to capitalism’s inequalities, contradictions, and raising need for war.Using relatively uniform methods internationally, Fortune reports profits fell 54.1 per cent from 2000 to 306 billion dollar. “Over production,” “overcapacity,” “lack of demand” is fundamentally behind this fall, even as hanger rises and the standard of living under capitalism declines. The 489 capitalist corporations on the list had combined revenues of 13.8 trillion-dollar or about 35 per cent of the world’s production of goods and services. Yet they employed only 42 million people, or 1 per cent of the 4 billion people in the world of working age in 2001. So 1 per cent of the world’s population accounts for 35 per cent of world production! This disparity speaks volumes about inequality and social productivity under capitalism. Billions of people have been left to scratch the earth, to forage garbage dumps, to work and live under conditions that would have horrified feudal serfs. The list also gives an indication of the relationship of force among imperialists powers. 197 of the 500 corporations this year are US based, up from 151 in 1995. These accounted for 43 per cent of the 500’s sales in 2001, up from 29 per cent six-year earlier. Only 87 hail from Japan, down from 149 in 1995; their shares of sales has fallen in half since 1995, to 17.4 per cent 143 corporations hail from the 15 European Union countries, down from 155 in 1995. Even more indicative of the relationship of forces is the distribution of profits. The US based corporation’s profits, some 217 billion dollar were more than double the profits of all the corporations from the rest of the world combined. The 87 Japanese corporations had combined profits of - negative 38 billion dollar. Yes, Japan Inc. Suffered net losses last year. Marx pointed out that capitalists are not beneath looting each other, using relative strength to pocket wealth from others. The first place to look for evidence is the oil monopolies. More than one hundred years ago, capitalist families led by the Rockefellers realised that energy products in general, and oil in particular, are like the oxygen of modern society. If they could monopolize oil, they could have a stranglehold not easily achievable from monopolising other industries. Monopolise they have. Oil, which costs an average of perhaps 2.40 dollar a barrel to produce (much less in the Middle East), has been selling for over 20 dollar for years. The results are evident on Fortune 500 lists. Five Oil monopolies are among the world’s 15 largest corporations. Exxon Mobil was (once again) the world’s most profitable corporation, reporting profits of 15.3 billion on sales of 192 billion dollar. Exxon accounted for 5 per cent of the Global 500’s total profits. Yet its sales were just 1.4 per cent, and its payroll but 0.2 per cent, of the 500’s total. That’s extra ordinary. In recent weeks, oil monopolies have reported a sharp decline in profits so far this year. A slumping world economy and “low” oil and gas prices were blamed. Almost simultaneously, Washington stepped up calls for more war in the Middle East, specifically against Iraq. Oil prices jumped. The owners of the oil monopolies – and big banks have a profound interest in “expensive oil, “ not cheap oil, even if achieved through war. A significant share of debt around the world owed to Wall Street is repaid from oil sales. Heavily indebted countries like Venezuela, Mexico or Nigeria may record big oil sales. But before they get a penny, Chase, Citi and other Wall Street banks first take their loot. “Low” oil prices endanger debt service. It is entirely possible that escalated war in the Middle east could temporarily double or triple the price of oil, bringing the owners of Exxon and Citibank momentary relief from their declining profits and growing scandals. But higher oil prices could push the shaky economies of Japan, Germany and other oil-dependent countries into full crisis. The working class has no interest in high-energy prices, war or economic crisis. Worldwide, working class parties and trade unions have played the leading role historically against high-energy prices. With Washington now beating the drums for escalated war in the Middle East, it is necessary to bring together the struggle against monopoly prices, imperialist wars and for working-class power. Courtesy: New Age 1-7 Sept.’02 |
| Copyright © 2002 - 2004 Electricity Employees Federation of India. All Rights Reserved. |
|