|
VOICE OF ELECTRICITY WORKERS
The best performers and the worst during 2003-04
Maharashtra led the states in
terms of thermal power generation, accounting for more than 46 billion units,
while Karnataka factor (PLF), karnataka was once again the frontrunner state
with a PLF of 88 per cent. Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and Orissa scored over the
other states in hydel generation at 7.3 billion units. Delhi was rated as the
best reforming state in January 2004 followed in that order. Meanwhile, the
peak deficit was the highest in Gujarat at 26.6 percent followed by Madhya
Pradesh, which by rating agency ICRA, followed by Andhra Pradesh, which had
stood first in the previous year’s rankings. In terms of plant load faced a
deficit of 22 per cent.
|
State |
Capacity
(MW)** |
ICRA rating
January 2004 |
Thermal generation
2002-03 2003-04 |
PLF (%)
2002-03 2003-04 |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
6,628.84 |
2 |
25,073.00 24,349.00 |
89.40 85.90 |
|
Bihar |
598.40 |
24 |
531.00 350.00 |
11.40 7.50 |
|
Chhattisgarh |
1,400.00 |
23 |
7,592.00 7,609.00 |
69.90 69.90 |
|
Delhi |
932.40 |
1 |
3,496.00 5,155.00 |
43.50 46.00 |
|
Gujarat |
5,210.30 |
5 |
27,145.00 25,517.00 |
66.70 62.10 |
|
Haryana |
1,990.32 |
6 |
5,967.00 6,743.00 |
66.50 74.90 |
|
Jammu& Kashmir |
495.63 |
27 |
58.00 29.00 |
- - |
|
Jharkhand |
1,390.00 |
- |
2,600.00 2,408.00 |
18.30 15.70 |
|
Karnataka |
4,523.07 |
4 |
11,005.00 11,777.00 |
90.40 87.90 |
|
Kerala |
2,031.60 |
15 |
652.00 580.00 |
- - |
|
Madhya Pradesh |
3,078.01 |
17 |
14,546.00 13,996.00 |
73.10 70.10 |
|
Maharashtra |
9,772.57 |
13 |
44,248.00 46,129.00 |
72.00 75.00 |
|
Orissa |
2,304.49 |
19 |
2,613.00 3,010.00 |
71.00 81.60 |
|
Punjab |
4,528.94 |
7 |
13,650.00 14,245.00 |
73.50 76.50 |
|
Rajasthan |
3,511.82 |
10 |
14,001.00 15,326.00 |
88.40 82.70 |
|
Tamil Nadu |
5,415.55 |
12 |
22,184.00 22,028.00 |
81.00 78.20 |
|
Uttaranchal |
954.15 |
14 |
- - |
- - |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
4,658.60 |
9 |
20,967.00 20,663.00 |
61.10 60.00 |
|
West Bengal |
3,582.87 |
11 |
15,410.00 16,082.00 |
54.80 55.60 |
|
*Including Sikkim
**
As on July 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydel Generation(MUs)
2002-03 2003-04 |
Peak deficit(%)
2003-04 |
Consumer
Metering(%)** |
Feeder
Metering(%)** |
T&D
losses (%)
|
|
3,664.00 3,196.00 |
10.50 |
91 |
100 |
26.10 |
|
59.00 47.00 |
19.00 |
50 |
41 |
32.00 |
|
247.00 296.00 |
9.50 |
72 |
70 |
33.80# |
|
- - |
3.00 |
100 |
96 |
- |
|
587.00 853.00 |
26.60 |
93 |
100 |
28.66 |
|
244.00 255.00 |
5.40 |
92 |
100 |
36.47 |
|
323.00 882.00 |
3.90 |
40 |
31 |
- |
|
76.00 142.00 |
12.70 |
62 |
86 |
42.00 |
|
7,087.00 7,327.00 |
12.40 |
80 |
100 |
31.68 |
|
4,814.00 3,910.00 |
9.80 |
100 |
100 |
30.40 |
|
1,857.00 2,717.00 |
22.10 |
63 |
100 |
42.00 |
|
4,034.00 4,006.00 |
18.20 |
88 |
97 |
38.59 |
|
3,153.00 5,958.00 |
6.50 |
81 |
46 |
43.00 |
|
3,516.00 4,385.00 |
5.10 |
100 |
100 |
24.67 |
|
53.00 646.00 |
0.00 |
94 |
100 |
42.00 |
|
2,728.00 2,040.00 |
3.00 |
81 |
100 |
18.00 |
|
3,343.00 3,391.00 |
5.10 |
87 |
100 |
35.00 |
|
1,454.00 2,143.00 |
16.50 |
91 |
100 |
36.00 |
|
510.00 491.00 |
4.80* |
97 |
98 |
30.00 |
Courtesy: Powerline :9/04
|
