Electricity Employees Federation of India

 

    Home | Voice of Electricity workers | Press Release | Resolutions | Feedback | About Us

VOICE OF ELECTRICITY WORKERS

January 2005 - March 2005 Index

RESOLUTIONS

RESOLUTION PASSED ON THE 10TH DECEMBER’ 04 RALLY OF ELECTRICITY EMPLOYEES AND ENGINEERS AT DELHI

We, the representatives of electricity employees and engineers from the length and breadth of the country who rallied to the parliament on the 10th of December under the banner of NCCOEEE unequivocally points out from our knowledge and experience of the last one and a half decade that, the present neo-liberal policies in power sector and it’s legal frame work - the Electricity act 2003 - are badly affecting the availability, accessibility and affordability of electricity to the majority of Indian people except a few who can resort to luxuries. It also deteriorates the efficiency of the system and service. It takes away the rights of the state governments and put the rural electrification in doll-drums. Being a basic need of people in the modern age and a basic infrastructure facility, this state of affair is affecting the overall development of the country in a big way. The act also provides room for the total privatization of power sector and subsequent shift to the market driven pricing of power, which is again suicidal to the vast majority of Indian people. So we demand to review the deleterious Electricity act 2003 at the earliest and scrap it if necessary to obviate further damages to the countries development on the lines we had already submitted in the memorandum to the Prime Minister of India on 7.9.04. We also demand to stall all the unbundling and privatization of electricity Boards, as that is now taking place in UP, till the review is satisfactorily done, and unbundled state electricity Boards should be restored, failing which we will be forced to resort to further course of agitation in this vital sector.

We call upon the electricity employees and engineers all over the country to prepare for a strike in case the Government of India is not taking positive steps in this regard within two months, the date for triggering of strike will be declared when the NCCOEEE meets shortly.

New Delhi

10.12.2004

Akhil Bharatiya Vidyut Mazdoor Sangh All India Federation of Electricity Employees

All India Federation of Power Diploma Engineers All India Power Engineers Federation

National Working Group on Power Sector Electricity Employees Federation of India

RESOLUTION AGAINST 3RD AMENDMENT IN INDIAN PATENT LAW (1970)

GoI had made its third amendments through an ordinance to the Indian Patent law (1970) in tune with patent co-operation treaty (1995) as envisaged in the TRIPS agreement of the WTO which was signed during 1995 in which India is a party. The amendment has a devastating effect in the maintenance of public health of Indian citizens, and spiralling effect in prices of, life saving drugs & generic medicines for AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis etc., in prices of fertilisers, software products, high yielding seeds etc. as the most important objective of the amendment is to change the ‘process patent regime’ to ‘product patent regime’. The 3rd amendment now being made is holistically changing the salient characteristics of Indian patent law which was considered to be a model that was adapted by developing countries in which safety provisions were made to prevent the usage of patent for monopolistic profiteering, neglecting the overall and scientific progress of the country and mankind. The present amendment is just adoption of US patent laws as articulated in TRIPS agreement which was prepared by Trans National Corporations (TNC) of USA, Europe and Japan in the drug manufacturing field, that is in 180 degree phase opposition to Indian patent law. Government of India has not even cared to make use of the flexibilities provided in the Doha declaration of the Ministerial conference of WTO, yielding to the pressure of TNC’s in drug manufacturing, which will be detrimental to people of India as well as to the people of developing and least developed countries.

So, the working committee of EEFI which met at Kolkatta on 12-13th of January ’05 express its strong protest on the 3rd amendment made to the patent law and join with the protest and concern expressed by CITU and other progressive trade unions and left political parties.

Copy of Letter from EEFI TO CENTRAL POWER MINISTER

Dear Shri P.M. Sayeed,

The National Electricity Policy now announced discarding the views of the National Coordination Committee of Electricity Employees and Engineers (NCCOEEE) except in one issue "the change is on the policy of rural electrification" but mere construction of lines, transformers and providing connections to rural dwellings alone will not serve any purpose. Only with the support of cross subsidy in tariff, the rural household can consume power. In the new power policy, government announced cross subsidy for those who consume less than 30 unit a month. The policy is bent upon levying the total cost for providing the supply and the cost to serve from all other sections of consumers without any discrimination based on their ability to pay or on the category of consumers which in turn will go against our nation’s overall development.

In a political environment conducive to guaranteed wind fall profiteering by private investors and market driven pricing of electricity, how an ordinary citizen of India can access power at affordable rate and increase their capacity to consume, to taste the technological developments? All these are reasonable questions for which no convincing answer is expected.

We were expecting another meeting as decided on 21st December’04 during the meeting you had with the representatives of National Coordination Committee of Electricity Employees and Engineers. But to our surprise instead of getting a date for next meeting the new power policy was announced which appears the concerns of the world bank country director, India sought through his letter dated 16.12.2004 to the Secretary Power, Government of India were addressed.

The essence of power policy is to attract private investment and returns on investment, will therefore, need to be provided in a manner that the sector is able to attract adequate investments, however experience shows nationally and internationally that the policy will enable the private operators to increase the power rates to sky-high levels.

I would therefore request you to kindly ally these apprehensions which has led to a situation where the assurances of "review of electricity act 2003" with NCCOEEE remains mere words.

With regards,

Yours sincerely,

Sd/-

(B.S. MEEL)
General Secretary

Shri. P.M. Sayeed,
Power Minister,Govt. of India,
New Delhi-1.

Copy of Letter from Com. A.B. BARDHAN TO CENTRAL

POWER MINISTER

Dear Shri P.M. Sayeed,

After our first meeting with you and your officers on the issue of "Review of the Electricity Act-2003", a second meeting was to be held. This was postponed because of your Haj Pilgrimage. We had expected that after your return you will soon fix a date for the second meeting. But no such meeting has been called.

Meanwhile, the "New Electricity Policy" was announced in the context of the Electricity Act-2003.

This means that you are not interested in any review, and do not wish to have any further discussion with the representatives of Electricity Employees and Engineers. If that be so, you may kindly intimate the same to us. We will draw the conclusion that the Government has no intention of discussion with organisations of employees and engineers over a matter which concerns them, whereas it finds the time to discuss with independent producers, organization of industrialists and chamber of commerce, etc. It seems you are prepared to drive the workers and engineers to the path of agitation and struggle.

With regards,

Yours,

Sd/-

(A.B. Bardhan)

Shri. P.M. Sayeed,

Minister of Power,

New Delhi.

Copy of Letter from Dipankar Mukherjee, Member of Parliament TO CENTRAL POWER MINISTER

Dear Shri Sayeed,

I am constrained to address this letter to you in the light of your repeated observation that Left’s concern on Electricity Act 2003 has been addressed in National Electricity Policy, announced by the Government.

As you are well aware, the Left parties had submitted a note to the Govt. outlining the serious reservations on some substantive issues in Electricity Act 2003. This required a structured discussion which unfortunately was never held. As a matter of fact such a discussion was assured to a delegation National Coordination Committee of Electricity Employees, led by S/Shri E. Balanandan and A. B. Bardhan on 7th September 2004 by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, and as far as I know by you to the same delegation on 21.12.2004.

Incidentally in a letter dated 16.12.2004 addressed to Secretary (Power), Govt. of India, Michael F. Carter, country Director, India, of World Bank, has following to say on this controversial Act:

"In addition, for the continued development of the power sector, the Government needs to expedite actions mandated under the new Electricity Act. Some of the priority actions include: notification of the National Electricity Policy; constitution of Appellate Tribunal; and notification of the functions of National Load Despatch Centre and the roles for the Regional Power Committees. These actions should be taken as soon as possible to bring more clarity in implementation of the Act. Further, an expanded transmission pricing regime needs to be developed, with the help of competent advisors, over the next one to two years, that is able to support open access, particularly to support the development of some spare capacity in the national grid for long term open access users and merchant plants and provide appropriate signals for investments in the transmission system.

It therefore appears that the concern of the World Bank and by no means of the ‘Left’ is being addressed through notification of National Electricity Policy. Your proposed road map for "Tariff Policy", "Constitution of Appellate Tribunal", "Open Access", etc. are further likely to strengthen such apprehension.

I would therefore request you to kindly allay this apprehension which has led to a situation where the assurance of "review of Electricity Act 2003" in CMP of the UPA Govt., remains mere words, eroding the credibility of the UPA Govt. in the process.

With regards,

Yours sincerely,

Sd/-

(Dipankar Mukherjee)

Shri P.M. Sayeed,

Minister of Power,

Government of India

Copyright © 2002 - 2005 Electricity Employees Federation of India. All Rights Reserved.
Email: 
info@eefi.org · Feedback · Terms and Conditions ·